Title |
Iterative expansion microscopy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Methods, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.4261 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jae-Byum Chang, Fei Chen, Young-Gyu Yoon, Erica E Jung, Hazen Babcock, Jeong Seuk Kang, Shoh Asano, Ho-Jun Suk, Nikita Pak, Paul W Tillberg, Asmamaw T Wassie, Dawen Cai, Edward S Boyden |
Abstract |
We recently developed a method called expansion microscopy, in which preserved biological specimens are physically magnified by embedding them in a densely crosslinked polyelectrolyte gel, anchoring key labels or biomolecules to the gel, mechanically homogenizing the specimen, and then swelling the gel-specimen composite by ∼4.5××Iterative expansion microscopyJae-Byum Chang1,2, Fei Chen3, Young-Gyu Yoon1,4, Erica E Jung1, Hazen Babcock5, Jeong Seuk Kang6, Shoh Asano1, Ho-Jun Suk7, Nikita Pak8, Paul W Tillberg4, Asmamaw T Wassie3, Dawen Cai9 &Edward S Boyden1,3,10,11We recently developed a method called expansion microscopy, in which preserved biological specimens are physically magnified by embedding them in a densely crosslinked polyelectrolyte gel, anchoring key labels or biomolecules to the gel, mechanically homogenizing the specimen, and then swelling the gel-specimen composite by ~4.5× in linear dimension. Here we describe iterative expansion microscopy (iExM), in which a sample is expanded ∼20×. After preliminary expansion a second swellable polymer mesh is formed in the space newly opened up by the first expansion, and the sample is expanded again. iExM expands biological specimens ∼4.5 × 4.5, or ∼20×, and enables ∼25-nm-resolution imaging of cells and tissues on conventional microscopes. We used iExM to visualize synaptic proteins, as well as the detailed architecture of dendritic spines, in mouse brain circuitry. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 51 | 35% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 6% |
Switzerland | 4 | 3% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
Germany | 3 | 2% |
Sweden | 3 | 2% |
France | 3 | 2% |
China | 2 | 1% |
Ireland | 2 | 1% |
Other | 13 | 9% |
Unknown | 52 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 81 | 56% |
Scientists | 55 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 778 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 183 | 23% |
Researcher | 157 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 73 | 9% |
Student > Master | 69 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 6% |
Other | 113 | 14% |
Unknown | 147 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 151 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 142 | 18% |
Neuroscience | 112 | 14% |
Chemistry | 53 | 7% |
Engineering | 51 | 6% |
Other | 115 | 15% |
Unknown | 165 | 21% |