↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2012 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2012 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00464-013-3263-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

John T. Paige, Timothy M. Farrell, Simon Bergman, Niazy Selim, Alan E. Harzman, Erin Schwarz, Yumi Hori, Jason Levine, Daniel J. Scott

Abstract

In an effort to fulfill its charge to develop and maintain a comprehensive educational program to serve the members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), the SAGES Continuing Education Committee (CEC) reports a summary of findings related to its evaluation of the 2012 SAGES annual meeting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 16%
Other 3 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 5 26%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Engineering 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,284,663
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,781
of 6,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,451
of 215,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#37
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,014 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.