↓ Skip to main content

Exercise for people with hip or knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of land-based and aquatic interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise for people with hip or knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of land-based and aquatic interventions
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, July 2010
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s6941
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann E Rahmann

Abstract

Expert opinion considers the referral of people with osteoarthritis (OA) for physiotherapy to be a core component of managing the functional disability and pain of the disease. Clinical guidelines for the physiotherapy management of people with OA focus on three main areas: exercise, pain relief, and specific manual therapy techniques. Land-based group and individual physiotherapy exercise programs, as well as manual therapy, have demonstrated a distinct benefit in favor of physiotherapy intervention. Similarly, both general and specific aquatic physiotherapy exercise programs have shown positive outcomes for people with OA. This review will focus primarily on therapeutic exercise to improve strength and fitness and reduce pain in people with hip or knee OA. An overview of the principles of hydrodynamics relevant to aquatic exercise is also included to facilitate an understanding of effective aquatic exercise programs. The issue of compliance with exercise programs will also be discussed. Clinicians will, therefore, gain an understanding of the benefits of land-based and aquatic exercise for people with OA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 170 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 25%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Lecturer 7 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 3%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 51 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 20%
Sports and Recreations 19 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 54 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2015.
All research outputs
#17,702,587
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#201
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,340
of 93,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.