↓ Skip to main content

What predicts performance during clinical psychology training?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Clinical Psychology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 487)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What predicts performance during clinical psychology training?
Published in
British Journal of Clinical Psychology, November 2013
DOI 10.1111/bjc.12035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrina Scior, Caroline E. Bradley, Henry W. W. Potts, Katherine Woolf, Amanda C de C Williams

Abstract

While the question of who is likely to be selected for clinical psychology training has been studied, evidence on performance during training is scant. This study explored data from seven consecutive intakes of the UK's largest clinical psychology training course, aiming to identify what factors predict better or poorer outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 6%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 50 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 61%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2016.
All research outputs
#863,101
of 14,225,209 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Clinical Psychology
#46
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,796
of 184,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Clinical Psychology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,225,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them