You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transcriptomic classification of genetically engineered mouse models of breast cancer identifies human subtype counterparts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-11-r125 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam D Pfefferle, Jason I Herschkowitz, Jerry Usary, Joshua Chuck Harrell, Benjamin T Spike, Jessica R Adams, Maria I Torres-Arzayus, Myles Brown, Sean E Egan, Geoffrey M Wahl, Jeffrey M Rosen, Charles M Perou |
| Abstract |
Human breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease consisting of multiple molecular subtypes. Genetically engineered mouse models are a useful resource for studying mammary cancers in vivo under genetically controlled and immune competent conditions. Identifying murine models with conserved human tumor features will facilitate etiology determinations, highlight the effects of mutations on pathway activation, and should improve preclinical drug testing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 38% |
| France | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Tunisia | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 31% |
| Researcher | 40 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 52 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,305,609
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,898
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,860
of 224,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#25
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.