↓ Skip to main content

Integration of TiO2 into the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii during frustule synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integration of TiO2 into the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii during frustule synthesis
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep03205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Lang, Francisco del Monte, Brian J. Rodriguez, Peter Dockery, David P. Finn, Abhay Pandit

Abstract

Nature has inspired the design of complex hierarchical structures in the field of material science. Diatoms, unicellular algae with a hallmark intricate siliceous cell wall, have provided such a stimulus. Altering the chemistry of the diatom frustule has been explored to expand on the potential application of diatoms. The ability to modify the diatom in vivo opens the possibility to tailor the diatom to the end application. Herein, we report the chemical modification of the living diatom T. weissflogii using a titania precursor, titanium (IV) bis-(ammonium lactato)-dihydroxide (TiBALDH). Incorporation of Ti into the diatom is achieved via repeated treatment of cultures with non-toxic concentrations of TiBALDH. The characteristic architectural features of the diatom are unaltered following chemical modification. Transformation of the living diatom provides opportunity to confer novel structural, chemical or functional properties upon the diatom. We report on a photocatalytic ability imparted upon the TiBALDH-modified diatom.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 21 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Engineering 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Materials Science 5 6%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,060,441
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#88,751
of 125,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,571
of 213,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#426
of 657 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 657 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.