↓ Skip to main content

Arthroscopic debridement for knee osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arthroscopic debridement for knee osteoarthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005118.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wiroon Laupattarakasem, Malinee Laopaiboon, Pisamai Laupattarakasem, Chut Sumananont

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive disease that initially affects the articular cartilage. Observational studies have shown benefits for arthroscopic debridement (AD) on the osteoarthritic knee, but other recent studies have yielded conflicting results that suggest AD may not be effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 296 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 20%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 12%
Researcher 28 9%
Other 26 9%
Other 59 19%
Unknown 57 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 4%
Engineering 10 3%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 53 17%
Unknown 70 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,174,405
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,670
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,778
of 155,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.