↓ Skip to main content

Arthroscopic debridement for knee osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arthroscopic debridement for knee osteoarthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005118.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wiroon Laupattarakasem, Malinee Laopaiboon, Pisamai Laupattarakasem, Chut Sumananont

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive disease that initially affects the articular cartilage. Observational studies have shown benefits for arthroscopic debridement (AD) on the osteoarthritic knee, but other recent studies have yielded conflicting results that suggest AD may not be effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 154 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Unspecified 15 9%
Other 49 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 53%
Unspecified 22 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Psychology 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 28 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2017.
All research outputs
#770,233
of 12,189,835 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,029
of 8,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,059
of 168,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,189,835 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.