↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Novel sRNAs in Mycobacterial Species

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of Novel sRNAs in Mycobacterial Species
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0079411
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chen-Hsun Tsai, Catherine Baranowski, Jonathan Livny, Kathleen A. McDonough, Joseph T. Wade, Lydia M. Contreras

Abstract

Bacterial small RNAs (sRNAs) are short transcripts that typically do not encode proteins and often act as regulators of gene expression through a variety of mechanisms. Regulatory sRNAs have been identified in many species, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis. Here, we use a computational algorithm to predict sRNA candidates in the mycobacterial species M. smegmatis and M. bovis BCG and confirmed the expression of many sRNAs using Northern blotting. Thus, we have identified 17 and 23 novel sRNAs in M. smegmatis and M. bovis BCG, respectively. We have also applied a high-throughput technique (Deep-RACE) to map the 5' and 3' ends of many of these sRNAs and identified potential regulators of sRNAs by analysis of existing ChIP-seq datasets. The sRNAs identified in this work likely contribute to the unique biology of mycobacteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 25%
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Professor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 9 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,695,914
of 25,216,325 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#102,407
of 218,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,349
of 220,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,855
of 5,149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,216,325 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.