You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of Methods for Cross-Sectional HIV Incidence Estimation in a Large, Community Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0078818 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oliver Laeyendecker, Michal Kulich, Deborah Donnell, Arnošt Komárek, Marek Omelka, Caroline E. Mullis, Greg Szekeres, Estelle Piwowar-Manning, Agnes Fiamma, Ronald H. Gray, Tom Lutalo, Charles S. Morrison, Robert A. Salata, Tsungai Chipato, Connie Celum, Erin M. Kahle, Taha E. Taha, Newton I. Kumwenda, Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Vivek Naranbhai, Jairam R. Lingappa, Michael D. Sweat, Thomas Coates, Susan H. Eshleman |
| Abstract |
Accurate methods of HIV incidence determination are critically needed to monitor the epidemic and determine the population level impact of prevention trials. One such trial, Project Accept, a Phase III, community-randomized trial, evaluated the impact of enhanced, community-based voluntary counseling and testing on population-level HIV incidence. The primary endpoint of the trial was based on a single, cross-sectional, post-intervention HIV incidence assessment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,191,906
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#85,166
of 194,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,326
of 212,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,976
of 5,143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.