↓ Skip to main content

Re-irradiation of spinal column metastases by IMRT: impact of setup errors on the dose distribution

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Re-irradiation of spinal column metastases by IMRT: impact of setup errors on the dose distribution
Published in
Radiation Oncology, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-8-269
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Gröger, Matthias G Hautmann, Rainer Loeschel, Natalia Repp, Oliver Kölbl, Barbara Dobler

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of an automated image guided patient setup correction on the dose distribution for ten patients with in-field IMRT re-irradiation of vertebral metastases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 52%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,285,728
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,039
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,012
of 187,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#36
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.