↓ Skip to main content

Patterns and Outcomes of Induction of Labour in Africa and Asia: A Secondary Analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Neonatal Health

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patterns and Outcomes of Induction of Labour in Africa and Asia: A Secondary Analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Neonatal Health
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065612
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua P. Vogel, João Paulo Souza, A. Metin Gülmezoglu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 238 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 20%
Student > Postgraduate 38 16%
Researcher 17 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Other 12 5%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 76 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 1%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 81 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,490,611
of 25,037,495 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,568
of 217,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,480
of 200,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#706
of 4,646 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,037,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,646 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.