↓ Skip to main content

Coordination of the health policy dialogue process in Guinea: pre- and post-Ebola

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coordination of the health policy dialogue process in Guinea: pre- and post-Ebola
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12913-016-1457-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadege Ade, Adzodo Réne, Mara Khalifa, Kevin Ousman Babila, Martin Ekeke Monono, Elongo Tarcisse, Juliet Nabyonga-Orem

Abstract

Policy dialogue can be defined as an iterative process that involves a broad range of stakeholders discussing a particular issue with a concrete purpose in mind. Policy dialogue in health is increasingly being recognised by health stakeholders in developing countries, as an important process or mechanism for improving collaboration and harmonization in health and for developing comprehensive and evidence-based health sector strategies and plans. It is with this perspective in mind that Guinea, in 2013, started a policy dialogue process, engaging a plethora of actors to revise the country's national health policy and develop a new national health development plan (2015-2024). This study examines the coordination of the policy dialogue process in developing these key strategic governance documents of the Guinean health sector from the actors' perspective. A qualitative case study approach was undertaken, comprising of interviews with key stakeholders who participated in the policy dialogue process. A review of the literature informed the development of a conceptual framework and the data collection survey questionnaire. The results were analysed both inductively and deductively. A total of 22 out of 32 individuals were interviewed. The results suggest both areas of strengths and weaknesses in the coordination of the policy dialogue process in Guinea. The aspects of good coordination observed were the iterative nature of the dialogue and the availability of neutral and well-experienced facilitators. Weak coordination was perceived through the unavailability of supporting documentation, time and financial constraints experienced during the dialogue process. The onset of the Ebola epidemic in Guinea impacted on coordination dynamics by causing a slowdown of its activities and then its virtual halt. The findings herein highlight the need for policy dialogue coordination structures to have the necessary administrative and institutional support to facilitate their effective functioning. The findings also point to the need for further research on the practical and operational aspects of national dialogue coordination structures to determine how to best strengthen their capacities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Social Sciences 17 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 25 29%