↓ Skip to main content

Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers

Overview of attention for article published in Gastric Cancer, December 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
1665 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers
Published in
Gastric Cancer, December 2000
DOI 10.1007/pl00011720
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takuji Gotoda, Akio Yanagisawa, Mitsuru Sasako, Hiroyuki Ono, Yukihiro Nakanishi, Tadakazu Shimoda, Yo Kato

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most important prognostic factor for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). A D2 gastrectomy has been the gold standard treatment. Strict criteria for endoscopic mucosal resection have been widely accepted in Japan. There are some trials aimed at expanding the indications for local treatment, although there has not been a comprehensive review of the risk of LNM with the lesions of EGC.METHODS: We investigated 5265 patients who had undergone gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for EGC at the National Cancer Center Hospital and the Cancer Institute Hospital. Nine clinicopathological factors were assessed for their possible association with LNM.RESULTS: None of the 1230 well differentiated intramucosal cancers of less than 30 mm diameter regardless of ulceration findings, were associated with metastases (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-0.3%). None of the 929 lesions without ulceration were associated with nodal metastases (95% CI, 0-0.4%) regardless of tumor size. Similarly to findings for intramucosal cancers, for submucosal lesions, there was a significant correlation between tumor size larger than 30 mm and lymphatic-vascular involvement with an increased risk of LNM. None of the 145 differentiated adenocarcinomas of less than 30-mm-diameter without lymphatic or venous permeation were associated with LNM, provided that the lesion had invaded less than 500 &mgr;m into the submucosa (95% CI, 0-2.5%).CONCLUSION: Based on our large series of cases, we have been able to clarify the risks associated with EGC and to propose expansion of the criteria for local treatment. However, accurate histological evaluation of the resected specimens is essential to avoid recurrence for such EGCs that should be cured.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 190 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Postgraduate 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 8%
Other 46 24%
Unknown 41 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 49 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Gastric Cancer
#350
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,978
of 114,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastric Cancer
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.