↓ Skip to main content

Integrated care for comorbid alcohol dependence and anxiety and/or depressive disorder: study protocol for an assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated care for comorbid alcohol dependence and anxiety and/or depressive disorder: study protocol for an assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1940-0640-8-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsten C Morley, Andrew Baillie, Claudia Sannibale, Maree Teesson, Paul S Haber

Abstract

A major barrier to successful treatment in alcohol dependence is psychiatric comorbidity. During treatment, the time to relapse is shorter, the drop-out rate is increased, and long-term alcohol consumption is greater for those with comorbid major depression or anxiety disorder than those with an alcohol use disorder with no comorbid mental disorder. The treatment of alcohol dependence and psychological disorders is often the responsibility of different services, and this can hinder the treatment process. Accordingly, there is a need for an effective integrated treatment for alcohol dependence and comorbid anxiety and/or depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 130 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 20%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 42 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 44 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,983,785
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#342
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,411
of 315,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.