↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating prevalence and risk factors of building-related symptoms among office workers: Seasonal characteristics of symptoms and psychosocial and physical environmental factors

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating prevalence and risk factors of building-related symptoms among office workers: Seasonal characteristics of symptoms and psychosocial and physical environmental factors
Published in
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12199-017-0645-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenichi Azuma, Koichi Ikeda, Naoki Kagi, U Yanagi, Haruki Osawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 12%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 52 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Engineering 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 57 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,422,295
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
#307
of 564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,624
of 328,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.