You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non‐specialist health worker interventions for the care of mental, neurological and substance‐abuse disorders in low‐ and middle‐income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009149.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadja van Ginneken, Prathap Tharyan, Simon Lewin, Girish N Rao, SM Meera, Jessica Pian, Sudha Chandrashekar, Vikram Patel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1181 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 210 | 18% |
| Researcher | 164 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 139 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 114 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 76 | 6% |
| Other | 216 | 18% |
| Unknown | 279 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 301 | 25% |
| Psychology | 176 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 150 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 99 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 2% |
| Other | 118 | 10% |
| Unknown | 332 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#469,425
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#829
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,259
of 321,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.