↓ Skip to main content

The Autonomic Signature of Guilt in Children: A Thermal Infrared Imaging Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Autonomic Signature of Guilt in Children: A Thermal Infrared Imaging Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0079440
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanos Ioannou, Sjoerd Ebisch, Tiziana Aureli, Daniela Bafunno, Helene Alexi Ioannides, Daniela Cardone, Barbara Manini, Gian Luca Romani, Vittorio Gallese, Arcangelo Merla

Abstract

So far inferences on early moral development and higher order self conscious emotions have mostly been based on behavioral data. Emotions though, as far as arguments support, are multidimensional notions. Not only do they involve behavioral actions upon perception of an event, but they also carry autonomic physiological markers. The current study aimed to examine and characterise physiological signs that underlie self-conscious emotions in early childhood, while grounding them on behavioral analyses. For this purpose, the "mishap paradigm" was used as the most reliable method for evoking feelings of "guilt" in children and autonomic facial temperature variation were detected by functional Infrared Imaging (fIRI). Fifteen children (age: 39-42 months) participated in the study. They were asked to play with a toy, falsely informed that it was the experimenter's "favourite", while being unaware that it was pre-planned to break. Mishap of the toy during engagement caused sympathetic arousal as shown by peripheral nasal vasoconstriction leading to a marked temperature drop, compared to baseline. Soothing after the mishap phase induced an increase in nose temperature, associated with parasympathetic activity suggesting that the child's distress was neutralized, or even overcompensated. Behavioral analyses reported signs of distress evoked by the paradigm, backing up the thermal observation. The results suggest that the integration of physiological elements should be crucial in research concerning socio-emotional development. fIRI is a non invasive and non contact method providing a powerful tool for inferring early moral emotional signs based on physiological observations of peripheral vasoconstriction, while preserving an ecological and natural context.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 20%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 35%
Engineering 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 30 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,886,620
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#23,645
of 207,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,470
of 311,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#616
of 5,152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.