↓ Skip to main content

Association between U.S. State AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) Features and HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation, 2001–2009

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between U.S. State AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) Features and HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation, 2001–2009
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0078952
Pubmed ID
Authors

David B. Hanna, Kate Buchacz, Kelly A. Gebo, Nancy A. Hessol, Michael A. Horberg, Lisa P. Jacobson, Gregory D. Kirk, Mari M. Kitahata, P. Todd Korthuis, Richard D. Moore, Sonia Napravnik, Pragna Patel, Michael J. Silverberg, Timothy R. Sterling, James H. Willig, Ann Collier, Hasina Samji, Jennifer E. Thorne, Keri N. Althoff, Jeffrey N. Martin, Benigno Rodriguez, Elizabeth A. Stuart, Stephen J. Gange, for the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design of the International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS

Abstract

U.S. state AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs) are federally funded to provide antiretroviral therapy (ART) as the payer of last resort to eligible persons with HIV infection. States differ regarding their financial contributions to and ways of implementing these programs, and it remains unclear how this interstate variability affects HIV treatment outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Other 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 52%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,810,584
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#159,388
of 199,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,887
of 305,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,929
of 5,228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.