↓ Skip to main content

Trust and Trustworthy Computing

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Trust and Trustworthy Computing'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Beyond Kernel-Level Integrity Measurement: Enabling Remote Attestation for the Android Platform
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 SBAP: Software-Based Attestation for Peripherals
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Key Attestation from Trusted Execution Environments
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Anonymous Authentication with TLS and DAA
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Group-Based Attestation: Enhancing Privacy and Management in Remote Attestation
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Towards a Trusted Mobile Desktop
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Application of Trusted Computing in Automation to Prevent Product Piracy
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Lagrangian E-Voting: Verifiability on Demand and Strong Privacy
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 μ TSS – A Simplified Trusted Software Stack
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Requirements for an Integrity-Protected Hypervisor on the x86 Hardware Virtualized Architecture
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 A DAA Scheme Using Batch Proof and Verification
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Pairing-Based DAA Scheme Further Reducing TPM Resources
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 An Anonymous Attestation Scheme with Optional Traceability
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Introducing the Trusted Virtual Environment Module: A New Mechanism for Rooting Trust in Cloud Computing
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 SegSlice: Towards a New Class of Secure Programming Primitives for Trustworthy Platforms
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Escrowed Data and the Digital Envelope
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Engineering Attestable Services
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Dynamic Enforcement of Platform Integrity
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 An Improved Memory Integrity Protection Scheme
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Robust Combiners for Software Hardening
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 The PUF Promise
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Privacy Requirements Engineering for Trustworthy e-Government Services
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Can Competitive Insurers Improve Network Security?
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Nudge: Intermediaries’ Role in Interdependent Network Security
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 How the Public Views Strategies Designed to Reduce the Threat of Botnets
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Axiomatic and Behavioural Trust
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 The Leap of Faith from Online to Offline: An Exploratory Study of Couchsurfing.org
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 The Role of Soft Information in Trust Building: Evidence from Online Social Lending
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Software on the Witness Stand: What Should It Take for Us to Trust It?
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Token-Based Cloud Computing
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Oblivious Transfer Based on Physical Unclonable Functions
Attention for Chapter 28: The Role of Soft Information in Trust Building: Evidence from Online Social Lending
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Role of Soft Information in Trust Building: Evidence from Online Social Lending
Chapter number 28
Book title
Trust and Trustworthy Computing
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-13869-0_28
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-213868-3, 978-3-64-213869-0
Authors

Stefanie Pötzsch, Rainer Böhme, Stefanie Pötzsch, Rainer Böhme, Pötzsch, Stefanie, Böhme, Rainer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 25%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 9 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 20%
Computer Science 8 18%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2013.
All research outputs
#15,276,424
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,646
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,204
of 163,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#98
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.