↓ Skip to main content

Avaliação das ações de detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Brasil por meio de indicadores de processo: estudo descritivo com dados do Sismama, 2010-2011

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avaliação das ações de detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Brasil por meio de indicadores de processo: estudo descritivo com dados do Sismama, 2010-2011
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2017
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742017000100007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeane Glaucia Tomazelli, Arn Migowski, Caroline Madalena Ribeiro, Mônica de Assis, Dolores Maria Franco de Abreu, Jeane Glaucia Tomazelli, Arn Migowski, Caroline Madalena Ribeiro, Mônica de Assis, Dolores Maria Franco de Abreu

Abstract

to assess actions for breast cancer early detection in the Brazilian National Health System using process indicators. this is a descriptive study with secondary data from the Breast Cancer Information System (Sismama), for the period from 2010 to 2011. 5,759,503 mammograms and 44,892 histopathological tests were assessed; screening mammography was predominant (96.2%), with annual interval (44.6%) and 51.2% of the patients were in the recommended age group (50 to 69 years); mammogram report was emitted in 30 days in 61.7% of the cases; among the 17,343 malignant lesions confirmed in the histopathological tests, 66.4% were detected through clinical examination. screening actions and early diagnosis in disagreement with the Ministry of Health's recommendations may compromise its effectiveness and entail greater risk to women; it is necessary to improve professional's adherence to screening guidelines, as well as enhance the control and assessment of the health services.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 14 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#13,807,462
of 15,650,802 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#179
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,933
of 267,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,650,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.