↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Comparison of Constitutive Promoters and the Doxycycline-Inducible Promoter

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
patent
85 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
418 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1932 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic Comparison of Constitutive Promoters and the Doxycycline-Inducible Promoter
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010611
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Yuxia Qin, Li Zhang, Kayla L. Clift, Imge Hulur, Andy Peng Xiang, Bing-Zhong Ren, Bruce T. Lahn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,932 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 23 1%
Germany 8 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Switzerland 5 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Other 16 <1%
Unknown 1863 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 488 25%
Researcher 403 21%
Student > Master 242 13%
Student > Bachelor 212 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 77 4%
Other 228 12%
Unknown 282 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 659 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 588 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 91 5%
Engineering 60 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 55 3%
Other 181 9%
Unknown 298 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,608,106
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,700
of 225,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,251
of 105,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#86
of 724 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 724 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.