↓ Skip to main content

Geobiotechnology I

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 200: Microbially supported phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils: strategies and applications.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Microbially supported phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils: strategies and applications.
Chapter number 200
Book title
Geobiotechnology I
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/10_2013_200
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-254709-6, 978-3-64-254710-2
Authors

René Phieler, Annekatrin Voit, Erika Kothe, Phieler, René, Voit, Annekatrin, Kothe, Erika

Editors

Axel Schippers, Franz Glombitza, Wolfgang Sand

Abstract

Heavy metal contamination of soil as a result of, for example, mining operations, evokes worldwide concern. The use of selected metal-accumulating plants to clean up heavy metal contaminated sites represents a sustainable and inexpensive method for remediation approaches and, at the same time, avoids destruction of soil function. Within this scenario, phytoremediation is the use of plants (directly or indirectly) to reduce the risks of contaminants in soil to the environment and human health. Microbially assisted bioremediation strategies, such as phytoextraction or phytostabilization, may increase the beneficial aspects and can be viewed as potentially useful methods for application in remediation of low and heterogeneously contaminated soil. The plant-microbe interactions in phytoremediation strategies include mutually beneficial symbiotic associations such as mycorrhiza, plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB), or endophytic bacteria that are discussed with respect to their impact on phytoremediation approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 5 9%
Professor 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 21%
Environmental Science 10 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 25 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,193,840
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#127
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,464
of 201,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.