↓ Skip to main content

Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism for Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurodegeneration, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
650 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism for Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Molecular Neurodegeneration, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-1326-8-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katja Prüßing, Aaron Voigt, Jörg B Schulz

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster provides an important resource for in vivo modifier screens of neurodegenerative diseases. To study the underlying pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, fly models that address Tau or amyloid toxicity have been developed. Overexpression of human wild-type or mutant Tau causes age-dependent neurodegeneration, axonal transport defects and early death. Large-scale screens utilizing a neurodegenerative phenotype induced by eye-specific overexpression of human Tau have identified several kinases and phosphatases, apoptotic regulators and cytoskeleton proteins as determinants of Tau toxicity in vivo. The APP ortholog of Drosophila (dAPPl) shares the characteristic domains with vertebrate APP family members, but does not contain the human Aβ42 domain. To circumvent this drawback, researches have developed strategies by either direct secretion of human Aβ42 or triple transgenic flies expressing human APP, β-secretase and Drosophila γ-secretase presenilin (dPsn). Here, we provide a brief overview of how fly models of AD have contributed to our knowledge of the pathomechanisms of disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 650 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 637 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 154 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 16%
Student > Master 89 14%
Researcher 54 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 3%
Other 54 8%
Unknown 181 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 164 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 139 21%
Neuroscience 69 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 2%
Chemistry 16 2%
Other 56 9%
Unknown 190 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,649,407
of 24,975,223 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#596
of 948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,881
of 315,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,975,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.