You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reproductive Health Voucher Program and Facility Based Delivery in Informal Settlements in Nairobi: A Longitudinal Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0080582 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Djesika D. Amendah, Martin Kavao Mutua, Catherine Kyobutungi, Evans Buliva, Ben Bellows |
Abstract |
In Kenya, the maternal mortality rate had ranged from 328 to 501 deaths per 100,000 live births over the last three decades. To reduce these rates, the government launched in 2006 a means-tested reproductive health output-based approach (OBA) voucher program that covers costs of antenatal care, a facility-based delivery (FBD) and a postnatal visit in prequalified healthcare facilities. This paper investigated whether women who bought the voucher for their index child and had a FBD were more likely to deliver a subsequent child in a facility compared to those who did not buy vouchers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Turkey | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 89 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 33% |
Researcher | 16 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2016.
All research outputs
#13,396,317
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#106,833
of 194,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,171
of 302,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,711
of 5,217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.