↓ Skip to main content

Mobilization of Endothelial Progenitors by Recurrent Bacteremias with a Periodontal Pathogen

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mobilization of Endothelial Progenitors by Recurrent Bacteremias with a Periodontal Pathogen
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054860
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moritz Kebschull, Manuela Haupt, Søren Jepsen, James Deschner, Georg Nickenig, Nikos Werner

Abstract

Periodontal infections are independent risk factors for atherosclerosis. However, the exact mechanisms underlying this link are yet unclear. Here, we evaluate the in vivo effects of bacteremia with a periodontal pathogen on endothelial progenitors, bone marrow-derived cells capable of endothelial regeneration, and delineate the critical pathways for these effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,354,532
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,258
of 194,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,483
of 280,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,727
of 5,006 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,006 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.