↓ Skip to main content

Clinical assessment to screen for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical assessment to screen for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010173.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanya Walsh, Joseph LY Liu, Paul Brocklehurst, Anne-Marie Glenny, Mark Lingen, Alexander R Kerr, Graham Ogden, Saman Warnakulasuriya, Crispian Scully

Abstract

The early detection and excision of potentially malignant disorders (PMD) of the lip and oral cavity that require intervention may reduce malignant transformations (though will not totally eliminate malignancy occurring), or if malignancy is detected during surveillance, there is some evidence that appropriate treatment may improve survival rates.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 190 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 20%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Psychology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 47 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#389,477
of 14,524,859 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,025
of 10,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,661
of 255,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,524,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.