You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical and multimodal biomarker correlates of ADNI neuropathological findings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2051-5960-1-65 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jon B Toledo, Nigel J Cairns, Xiao Da, Kewei Chen, Deborah Carter, Adam Fleisher, Erin Householder, Napatkamon Ayutyanont, Auttawut Roontiva, Robert J Bauer, Paul Eisen, Leslie M Shaw, Christos Davatzikos, Michael W Weiner, Eric M Reiman, John C Morris, John Q Trojanowski, the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
| Abstract |
Autopsy series commonly report a high percentage of coincident pathologies in demented patients, including patients with a clinical diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). However many clinical and biomarker studies report cases with a single neurodegenerative disease. We examined multimodal biomarker correlates of the consecutive series of the first 22 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative autopsies. Clinical data, neuropsychological measures, cerebrospinal fluid Aβ, total and phosphorylated tau and α-synuclein and MRI and FDG-PET scans. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 30% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 19% |
| Researcher | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Professor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 21% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 16% |
| Psychology | 15 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,512,734
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#401
of 1,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,204
of 217,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.