You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preliminary Findings of a Randomized Trial of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions to Prevent Influenza Transmission in Households
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002101 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin J. Cowling, Rita O. P. Fung, Calvin K. Y. Cheng, Vicky J. Fang, Kwok Hung Chan, Hong Seto, Raymond Yung, Billy Chiu, Paco Lee, Timothy M. Uyeki, Peter M. Houck, J. S. Malik Peiris, Gabriel M. Leung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 14% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Turkey | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Oman | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 93% |
| Scientists | 5 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Cameroon | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| French Polynesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 207 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 42 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 22% |
| Unknown | 52 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#421,488
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,912
of 225,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#709
of 88,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#13
of 340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.