↓ Skip to main content

Reflecting on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a United Kingdom-wide, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in gynaecology outpatient settings

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reflecting on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a United Kingdom-wide, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in gynaecology outpatient settings
Published in
Trials, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-389
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylvia Dickson, Janet Logan, Suzanne Hagen, Diane Stark, Cathryn Glazener, Alison M McDonald, Gladys McPherson

Abstract

Successful recruitment of participants to any trial is central to its success. Trial results are routinely published, and recruitment is often cited to be slower and more difficult than anticipated. This article reflects on the methodological challenges of recruiting women with prolapse attending United Kingdom (UK) gynaecology outpatient clinics to a multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of physiotherapy, and the systems put in place in an attempt to address them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 58 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 19%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 65 43%