You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Features of Effective Medical Knowledge Resources to Support Point of Care Learning: A Focus Group Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0080318 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A. Cook, Kristi J. Sorensen, William Hersh, Richard A. Berger, John M. Wilkinson |
| Abstract |
Health care professionals access various information sources to quickly answer questions that arise in clinical practice. The features that favorably influence the selection and use of knowledge resources remain unclear. We sought to better understand how clinicians select among the various knowledge resources available to them, and from this to derive a model for an effective knowledge resource. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 23% |
| Canada | 4 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Australia | 3 | 14% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Cuba | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 20% |
| Librarian | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 32% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 35% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,648,720
of 25,016,456 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#20,470
of 216,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,262
of 317,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#574
of 5,203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,016,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.