↓ Skip to main content

Setting a Research Agenda to Inform Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programs

Overview of attention for article published in Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Setting a Research Agenda to Inform Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programs
Published in
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, January 2015
DOI 10.1310/tsr2005-409
Pubmed ID
Authors

William D. Hula, Leora R. Cherney, Linda E. Worrall

Abstract

Research into intensive comprehensive aphasia programs (ICAPs) has yet to show that this service delivery model is efficacious, effective, has cost utility, or can be broadly implemented. This article describes a phased research approach to the study of ICAPs and sets out a research agenda that considers not only the specific issues surrounding ICAPs, but also the phase of the research. Current ICAP research is in the early phases, with dosing and outcome measurement as prime considerations as well as refinement of the best treatment protocol. Later phases of ICAP research are outlined, and the need for larger scale collaborative funded research is recognized. The need for more rapid translation into practice is also acknowledged, and the use of hybrid models of phased research is encouraged within the ICAP research agenda.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 19%
Psychology 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 23%