You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enamel etching for bonding fixed orthodontic braces
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005516.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haikun Hu, Chunjie Li, Fan Li, Jianwei Chen, Jianfeng Sun, Shujuan Zou, Andrew Sandham, Qiang Xu, Philip Riley, Qingsong Ye |
| Abstract |
Acid etching of tooth surfaces to promote the bonding of orthodontic attachments to the enamel has been a routine procedure in orthodontic treatment since the 1960s. Various types of orthodontic etchants and etching techniques have been introduced in the past five decades. Although a large amount of information on this topic has been published, there is a significant lack of consensus regarding the clinical effects of different dental etchants and etching techniques. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 25% |
| Spain | 4 | 17% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 21% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 251 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Researcher | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 19% |
| Unknown | 82 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 109 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 89 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,435,764
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,086
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,339
of 318,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.