↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate elderly: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate elderly: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Published in
Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology, November 2013
DOI 10.1111/cdoe.12085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald McKenna, Finbarr Allen, Noel Woods, Denis O'Mahony, Michael Cronin, Cristiane DaMata, Charles Normand

Abstract

To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing two different tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate older patients, namely partial removable dental prostheses (RDP) and functionally orientated treatment based on the shortened dental arch concept (SDA).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Researcher 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Materials Science 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 10 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,103,228
of 19,822,123 outputs
Outputs from Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology
#152
of 1,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,190
of 292,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,822,123 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.