↓ Skip to main content

The Future of Thiazolidinedione Therapy in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Future of Thiazolidinedione Therapy in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11892-013-0378-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanford Yau, Kathya Rivera, Romina Lomonaco, Kenneth Cusi

Abstract

Since their approval, thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have been used extensively as insulin-sensitizers for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Activation of peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) nuclear receptors by TZDs leads to a vast spectrum of metabolic and antiinflammatory effects. In the past decade, clinicians and scientists across the fields of metabolism, diabetes, liver disease (NAFLD), atherosclerosis, inflammation, infertility, and even cancer have had high hopes about the potential for TZDs to treat many of these diseases. However, an increasing awareness about undesirable "off-target" effects of TZDs have made us rethink their role and be more cautious about the long-term benefits and risks related to their use. This review examines the most relevant work on the benefits and risks associated with TZD treatment, with a focus on the only PPARγ agonist currently available (pioglitazone), aiming to offer the reader a balanced overview about the current and future role of TZDs in the management of insulin-resistant states and T2DM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 140 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 46 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 48 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,500,467
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#230
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,334
of 193,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them