↓ Skip to main content

Time Frame and Justice Motive: Future Perspective Moderates the Adaptive Function of General Belief in a Just World

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time Frame and Justice Motive: Future Perspective Moderates the Adaptive Function of General Belief in a Just World
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0080668
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Shengtao Wu, Robbie M. Sutton, Xiaodan Yan, Chan Zhou, Yiwen Chen, Zhuohong Zhu, Buxin Han

Abstract

The human ability to envision the future, that is, to take a future perspective (FP), plays a key role in the justice motive and its function in transcending disadvantages and misfortunes. The present research investigated whether individual (Study 1) and situational (Study 2) differences in FP moderated the association of general belief in a just world (GBJW) with psychological resilience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2013.
All research outputs
#20,211,690
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,180
of 194,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,071
of 306,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,479
of 5,159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.