↓ Skip to main content

Author reply to A commentary on Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Genetics, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Author reply to A commentary on Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs
Published in
Nature Reviews Genetics, December 2013
DOI 10.1038/nrg3457-c2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi R. Wray, Jian Yang, Ben J. Hayes, Alkes L. Price, Michael E. Goddard, Peter M. Visscher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 52 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Researcher 15 26%
Student > Master 10 17%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Unspecified 4 7%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 5 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,988,484
of 10,232,583 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Genetics
#1,758
of 1,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,683
of 188,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Genetics
#46
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,232,583 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.