↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic accuracy of clinicians for back, neck and shoulder patients in routine practice

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic accuracy of clinicians for back, neck and shoulder patients in routine practice
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-709x-21-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dave Newell, Jonathan Field, Nita Visnes

Abstract

Chronicity amongst musculoskeletal patients remains a considerable burden and predicting outcomes in these patients has proven difficult. Although a large number of studies have investigated a range of predictors of outcome few have looked at the practitioners' ability to discern those that improve from those most likely to fail to improve. This study aimed to investigate the ability of chiropractors to predict patient outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 32%
Unspecified 4 21%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 53%
Unspecified 4 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,112,574
of 6,229,233 outputs
Outputs from Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
#154
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,300
of 141,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,229,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.