You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictive factors of adherence to frequency and duration components in home exercise programs for neck and low back pain: an observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-10-155 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesc Medina-Mirapeix, Pilar Escolar-Reina, Juan J Gascón-Cánovas, Joaquina Montilla-Herrador, Francisco J Jimeno-Serrano, Sean M Collins |
| Abstract |
Evidence suggests that to facilitate physical activity sedentary people may adhere to one component of exercise prescriptions (intensity, duration or frequency) without adhering to other components. Some experts have provided evidence for determinants of adherence to different components among healthy people. However, our understanding remains scarce in this area for patients with neck or low back pain. The aims of this study are to determine whether patients with neck or low back pain have different rates of adherence to exercise components of frequency per week and duration per session when prescribed with a home exercise program, and to identify if adherence to both exercise components have distinct predictive factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 23% |
| Canada | 4 | 9% |
| Australia | 4 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Scientists | 4 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 326 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 11% |
| Researcher | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 75 | 22% |
| Unknown | 66 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 25 | 7% |
| Psychology | 16 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 87 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,334,347
of 25,692,343 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#206
of 4,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,323
of 177,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,692,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.