↓ Skip to main content

Continental-Scale Governance and the Hastening of Loss of Australia's Biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continental-Scale Governance and the Hastening of Loss of Australia's Biodiversity
Published in
Conservation Biology, December 2013
DOI 10.1111/cobi.12189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Euan G. Ritchie, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Chris R. Dickman, Richard Hobbs, Christopher N. Johnson, Emma L. Johnston, William F. Laurance, David Lindenmayer, Michael A. McCarthy, Dale G. Nimmo, Hugh H. Possingham, Robert L. Pressey, David M. Watson, John Woinarski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 6 8%
United States 4 5%
United Kingdom 3 4%
Mexico 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 57 76%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Researcher 15 20%
Other 10 13%
Professor 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 39 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 21%
Unspecified 8 11%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Decision Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2018.
All research outputs
#252,946
of 12,348,877 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#172
of 2,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,645
of 213,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,348,877 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.