↓ Skip to main content

Continental-Scale Governance and the Hastening of Loss of Australia's Biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continental-Scale Governance and the Hastening of Loss of Australia's Biodiversity
Published in
Conservation Biology, December 2013
DOI 10.1111/cobi.12189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Euan G. Ritchie, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Chris R. Dickman, Richard Hobbs, Christopher N. Johnson, Emma L. Johnston, William F. Laurance, David Lindenmayer, Michael A. McCarthy, Dale G. Nimmo, Hugh H. Possingham, Robert L. Pressey, David M. Watson, John Woinarski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 6 6%
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Finland 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 76 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Other 12 13%
Professor 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 48 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 22%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Decision Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 10 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#275,825
of 14,130,850 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#174
of 2,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,672
of 254,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,130,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.