↓ Skip to main content

Continental-Scale Governance and the Hastening of Loss of Australia's Biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continental-Scale Governance and the Hastening of Loss of Australia's Biodiversity
Published in
Conservation Biology, December 2013
DOI 10.1111/cobi.12189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Euan G. Ritchie, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Chris R. Dickman, Richard Hobbs, Christopher N. Johnson, Emma L. Johnston, William F. Laurance, David Lindenmayer, Michael A. McCarthy, Dale G. Nimmo, Hugh H. Possingham, Robert L. Pressey, David M. Watson, John Woinarski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 6 6%
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Finland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 85 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Other 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Professor 9 9%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 51 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 22%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Design 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 14 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#396,114
of 17,625,695 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#240
of 3,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,527
of 273,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,625,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.