You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Rat feeding studies with genetically modified maize - a comparative evaluation of applied methods and risk assessment standards
Environmental Sciences Europe, December 2013
Hartmut Meyer, Angelika Hilbeck
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||61||86%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||5||7%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||6||20%|
|Student > Bachelor||5||17%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||15||50%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||3||10%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,837,702 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
of 547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 320,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,702 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.