↓ Skip to main content

Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society…

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2376 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2042 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel
Published in
European Heart Journal, April 2017
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian A. Ference, Henry N. Ginsberg, Ian Graham, Kausik K. Ray, Chris J. Packard, Eric Bruckert, Robert A. Hegele, Ronald M. Krauss, Frederick J. Raal, Heribert Schunkert, Gerald F. Watts, Jan Borén, Sergio Fazio, Jay D. Horton, Luis Masana, Stephen J. Nicholls, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Bart van de Sluis, Marja-Riitta Taskinen, Lale Tokgözoğlu, Ulf Landmesser, Ulrich Laufs, Olov Wiklund, Jane K. Stock, M. John Chapman, Alberico L. Catapano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 844 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,042 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 2038 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 238 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 213 10%
Student > Master 198 10%
Researcher 177 9%
Other 126 6%
Other 336 16%
Unknown 754 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 520 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 229 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 111 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 3%
Other 204 10%
Unknown 835 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 738. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#27,841
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#61
of 11,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#506
of 327,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#2
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.