You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diversity and ecological adaptations in Palaeogene lichens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Plants, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nplants.2017.49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ulla Kaasalainen, Alexander R. Schmidt, Jouko Rikkinen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Thailand | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| China | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 16% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2021.
All research outputs
#676,473
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#404
of 2,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,752
of 327,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#12
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.