↓ Skip to main content

Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711]
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-230x-13-161
Pubmed ID
Authors

van Brunschot S, van Grinsven J, Voermans RP, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, Boermeester MA, Bollen TL, Bosscha K, Bouwense SA, Bruno MJ, Cappendijk VC, Consten EC, Dejong CH, Dijkgraaf MG, van Eijck CH, Erkelens GW, van Goor H, Hadithi M, Haveman JW, Hofker SH, Jansen JJ, Laméris JS, van Lienden KP, Manusama ER, Meijssen MA, Mulder CJ, Nieuwenhuis VB, Poley JW, de Ridder RJ, Rosman C, Schaapherder AF, Scheepers JJ, Schoon EJ, Seerden T, Spanier BM, Straathof JW, Timmer R, Venneman NG, Vleggaar FP, Witteman BJ, Gooszen HG, van Santvoort HC, Fockens P, Sandra van Brunschot, Janneke van Grinsven, Rogier P Voermans, Olaf J Bakker, Marc GH Besselink, Marja A Boermeester, Thomas L Bollen, Koop Bosscha, Stefan A Bouwense, Marco J Bruno, Vincent C Cappendijk, Esther C Consten, Cornelis H Dejong, Marcel GW Dijkgraaf, Casper H van Eijck, G Willemien Erkelens, Harry van Goor, Mohammed Hadithi, Jan-Willem Haveman, Sijbrand H Hofker, Jeroen JM Jansen, Johan S Laméris, Krijn P van Lienden, Eric R Manusama, Maarten A Meijssen, Chris J Mulder, Vincent B Nieuwenhuis, Jan-Werner Poley, Rogier J de Ridder, Camiel Rosman, Alexander F Schaapherder, Joris J Scheepers, Erik J Schoon, Tom Seerden, BW Marcel Spanier, Jan Willem A Straathof, Robin Timmer, Niels G Venneman, Frank P Vleggaar, Ben J Witteman, Hein G Gooszen, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Paul Fockens

Abstract

Infected necrotising pancreatitis is a potentially lethal disease that nearly always requires intervention. Traditionally, primary open necrosectomy has been the treatment of choice. In recent years, the surgical step-up approach, consisting of percutaneous catheter drainage followed, if necessary, by (minimally invasive) surgical necrosectomy has become the standard of care. A promising minimally invasive alternative is the endoscopic transluminal step-up approach. This approach consists of endoscopic transluminal drainage followed, if necessary, by endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy. We hypothesise that the less invasive endoscopic step-up approach is superior to the surgical step-up approach in terms of clinical and economic outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 5%
Spain 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 37 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Master 8 19%
Other 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 86%
Unspecified 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Chemistry 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,633,875
of 8,577,291 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#213
of 699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,751
of 180,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,577,291 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 56th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 699 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.