↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing blood loss during the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing blood loss during the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001421.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre PL Martin-Hirsch, Andrew Bryant

Abstract

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is the most common pre-malignant lesion. Surgical treatments for CIN are commonly associated with blood loss.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 11 16%
Other 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 13 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,802,813
of 13,887,828 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,473
of 10,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,107
of 252,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,887,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.