↓ Skip to main content

Understanding Variation in Transcription Factor Binding by Modeling Transcription Factor Genome-Epigenome Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding Variation in Transcription Factor Binding by Modeling Transcription Factor Genome-Epigenome Interactions
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chieh-Chun Chen, Shu Xiao, Dan Xie, Xiaoyi Cao, Chun-Xiao Song, Ting Wang, Chuan He, Sheng Zhong

Abstract

Despite explosive growth in genomic datasets, the methods for studying epigenomic mechanisms of gene regulation remain primitive. Here we present a model-based approach to systematically analyze the epigenomic functions in modulating transcription factor-DNA binding. Based on the first principles of statistical mechanics, this model considers the interactions between epigenomic modifications and a cis-regulatory module, which contains multiple binding sites arranged in any configurations. We compiled a comprehensive epigenomic dataset in mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells, including DNA methylation (MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq), DNA hydroxymethylation (5-hmC-seq), and histone modifications (ChIP-seq). We discovered correlations of transcription factors (TFs) for specific combinations of epigenomic modifications, which we term epigenomic motifs. Epigenomic motifs explained why some TFs appeared to have different DNA binding motifs derived from in vivo (ChIP-seq) and in vitro experiments. Theoretical analyses suggested that the epigenome can modulate transcriptional noise and boost the cooperativity of weak TF binding sites. ChIP-seq data suggested that epigenomic boost of binding affinities in weak TF binding sites can function in mES cells. We showed in theory that the epigenome should suppress the TF binding differences on SNP-containing binding sites in two people. Using personal data, we identified strong associations between H3K4me2/H3K9ac and the degree of personal differences in NFκB binding in SNP-containing binding sites, which may explain why some SNPs introduce much smaller personal variations on TF binding than other SNPs. In summary, this model presents a powerful approach to analyze the functions of epigenomic modifications. This model was implemented into an open source program APEG (Affinity Prediction by Epigenome and Genome, http://systemsbio.ucsd.edu/apeg).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 4%
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 91 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Student > Master 12 12%
Professor 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 3 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 23%
Computer Science 7 7%
Mathematics 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 5 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,125,617
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,727
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,077
of 322,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#33
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.