↓ Skip to main content

Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
948 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncomms15043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Pirandola, Riccardo Laurenza, Carlo Ottaviani, Leonardo Banchi

Abstract

Quantum communications promises reliable transmission of quantum information, efficient distribution of entanglement and generation of completely secure keys. For all these tasks, we need to determine the optimal point-to-point rates that are achievable by two remote parties at the ends of a quantum channel, without restrictions on their local operations and classical communication, which can be unlimited and two-way. These two-way assisted capacities represent the ultimate rates that are reachable without quantum repeaters. Here, by constructing an upper bound based on the relative entropy of entanglement and devising a dimension-independent technique dubbed 'teleportation stretching', we establish these capacities for many fundamental channels, namely bosonic lossy channels, quantum-limited amplifiers, dephasing and erasure channels in arbitrary dimension. In particular, we exactly determine the fundamental rate-loss tradeoff affecting any protocol of quantum key distribution. Our findings set the limits of point-to-point quantum communications and provide precise and general benchmarks for quantum repeaters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 326 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 20%
Student > Master 46 14%
Researcher 41 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Professor 14 4%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 96 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 160 48%
Engineering 28 8%
Computer Science 21 6%
Mathematics 5 2%
Materials Science 5 2%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 102 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#598,440
of 24,115,737 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#10,368
of 51,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,942
of 313,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#305
of 1,019 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,115,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,019 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.