↓ Skip to main content

Females and Precarious Board Positions: Further Evidence of the Glass Cliff

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Management, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 676)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Females and Precarious Board Positions: Further Evidence of the Glass Cliff
Published in
British Journal of Management, December 2013
DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.12046
Authors

Mark Mulcahy, Carol Linehan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 21%
Student > Master 38 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Researcher 12 6%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 77 40%
Psychology 34 18%
Social Sciences 23 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 8%
Philosophy 3 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 27 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#162,870
of 18,475,574 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Management
#3
of 676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,911
of 280,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Management
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,475,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.