↓ Skip to main content

Poly(dA:dT)-Rich DNAs Are Highly Flexible in the Context of DNA Looping

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Poly(dA:dT)-Rich DNAs Are Highly Flexible in the Context of DNA Looping
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0075799
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Johnson, Yi-Ju Chen, Rob Phillips

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 10%
Mexico 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 52 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 45%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 27%
Physics and Astronomy 11 18%
Engineering 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,206,167
of 24,140,950 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,127
of 207,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,132
of 215,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,963
of 5,101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,140,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.