You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors Associated with Failed Treatment: an Analysis of 121,744 Women Embarking on Their First IVF Cycles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0082249 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Siladitya Bhattacharya, Abha Maheshwari, Jill Mollison |
| Abstract |
In-vitro fertilization (IVF) is the treatment of choice for unresolved infertility. It comprises a number of key steps, each of which has to be negotiated before the next is attempted, but the factors which are associated with failure at each stage have not been reported. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2022.
All research outputs
#345,567
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,077
of 195,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,513
of 307,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#162
of 5,027 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,027 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.