RT @AncientEpoch: Source Paper: https://t.co/LgzyQL81Ak
Source Paper: https://t.co/LgzyQL81Ak
@FrancoisCardin2 Il y avait des gens avant. Au nord, les inuits sont reliés aux indigènes du nord de la russie. Les amérindiens existants aujourd’hui ont des traces significatives d’indoeuropéens, tous commes les basques ou les géorgiens. https://t.co/b6KI
@waitbutwhy This is according to some very close minded anti-science. Nature ran an article a few years back about conclusive evidence for humans in North America 130,000 years ago 🫢 https://t.co/7VF7vIRdIf
@ExpChristianity @gregsart We've found human remains at the La Brea Tar Pits dating to 10,000 bp. California has been occupied by humans for at LEAST 30K years, with some compelling evidence pushing that back to 130k years ago. https://t.co/WNu8MaOsXm.
@NMarbletoe @Swainger_Danger @EchosofWisdom @historyinmemes @MarkBoslough Makes me wonder what’s wrong with this study. Nature has screwed up before. For example… https://t.co/EQ9TD7K9dQ
@BrainFood4any1 @ReacNat @LakotaMan1 Not really. https://t.co/I3ES4Jj5jv
@Shadidi_Designs You posted something from 2008? https://t.co/uJhgUS19Ln
@DrDavidMiano Are you familiar with this paper from 2017 about the discovery of a 130,000 year old settlement in San Diego? I'm a fellow floridian and love your videos. Would be interested to hear your thoughts. https://t.co/au5IZsqfTB
@DeFiYodda @oFFMetaSweat @historyinmemes @robertsepehr 🍀 Nature Journal is the most prestigious publication in the field: 😎 👇 https://t.co/QyGfBIwC5p
@grimsr3ap3r79 @grepmeded @EricRWeinstein Looks to me that the conventional Archaeological narrative is trying to fight Nature. https://t.co/TPFAKLl5Os And the toxicologists hate the vaccinologists, etc etc. https://t.co/NVvHIpoSOo
@femalekissinger what about the theories concerning the possibility of the existence of a hominin species over 120k years ago? that'd fundamentally alter the timetable. https://t.co/8HyZx5jdIk
@johnslaymaker @DrDavidMiano @Mayascribe @TruthShepherdd @SanctumAncient @nascar_oz @BrightInsight6 “deliberate career destruction of anyone who opposed the party line” Explain to me exactly how Steven Holen, the lead author on the 2017 Cerutti mastodon p
RT @Laocoon002: 埃及两河的陶器技术、石雕技术、宗教艺术风格就是怎么进入美洲的。【注:丹尼索瓦人、尼安德特人和南方晚期智人并没有生殖隔离,属于统一物种的不同亚种。】 说道这里你是不是又好奇为什么南方晚期智人进入美洲前丹尼索瓦人就已经进入美洲了?? 看完这篇论文,你…
埃及两河的陶器技术、石雕技术、宗教艺术风格就是怎么进入美洲的。【注:丹尼索瓦人、尼安德特人和南方晚期智人并没有生殖隔离,属于统一物种的不同亚种。】 说道这里你是不是又好奇为什么南方晚期智人进入美洲前丹尼索瓦人就已经进入美洲了?? 看完这篇论文,你就知道了。https://t.co/aHc1IMl20h
RT @blakandblack: A New Study Says Humans Were in America 130,000 Years Ago That’s 100,000 years earlier than previously thought—and most…
RT @blakandblack: A New Study Says Humans Were in America 130,000 Years Ago That’s 100,000 years earlier than previously thought—and most…
RT @blakandblack: A New Study Says Humans Were in America 130,000 Years Ago That’s 100,000 years earlier than previously thought—and most…
My opinion is they wouldn’t know , they used to think the world was flat , and that world was only 6000 yrs old and can’t figure out how they built the pyramids
RT @blakandblack: A New Study Says Humans Were in America 130,000 Years Ago That’s 100,000 years earlier than previously thought—and most…
RT @blakandblack: A New Study Says Humans Were in America 130,000 Years Ago That’s 100,000 years earlier than previously thought—and most…
RT @blakandblack: A New Study Says Humans Were in America 130,000 Years Ago That’s 100,000 years earlier than previously thought—and most…
RT @blakandblack: A New Study Says Humans Were in America 130,000 Years Ago That’s 100,000 years earlier than previously thought—and most…
RT @Peter15930204: Why not.
Why not.
RT @blakandblack: A New Study Says Humans Were in America 130,000 Years Ago That’s 100,000 years earlier than previously thought—and most…
A New Study Says Humans Were in America 130,000 Years Ago That’s 100,000 years earlier than previously thought—and most archaeologists aren’t buying it. https://t.co/GSr92A7HSw
@KaySmythe @DailyCaller In the journal Nature, the leading journal in the scientific field, published on The Cerutti Mastodon site, which would mean North American habituation would have first occurred pre-modern Homo Saipan, 130,000 years ago. https://t.c
Check out this cool article in Nature about a Mastadon that was discovered in Southern California! https://t.co/5qm1HpdBBH
@ianehcua @MarkBoslough @SoilManDan @JasonColavito It’s important to point out that not all peer-reviewed journals are equal. Major journals screw up from time to time, too, as with the paper on the Cerutti mastodon, which came out at the same time as Swea
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
RT @AlessandroLoio2: Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA.…
Lá do Telegram. Fonte principal: Holen SR et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA. Nature. 27 April 2017; 544:479–483. https://t.co/Hx8ApTsgW8 https://t.co/jEUQSASUQL
@ChrisStringer65 it is not surprising 😅 https://t.co/fN66TQJLU2
@Commenter51 @real_lord_miles @culturaltutor Polynesian gene flow predates Easter Island https://t.co/guYoPgFXdp 130,000 year old Mastodon remains in Southern California strongly suggest human interaction. https://t.co/NK9cirwpfa
@ma_nyc7 This is the controversial article I was thinking of https://t.co/zCcHxl97zv
RT @lastrealhumans: A 130,000 year old archeological site in the United States has, for all intents and purposes, been confirmed for 5 year…
RT @lastrealhumans: A 130,000 year old archeological site in the United States has, for all intents and purposes, been confirmed for 5 year…
RT @lastrealhumans: A 130,000 year old archeological site in the United States has, for all intents and purposes, been confirmed for 5 year…
RT @lastrealhumans: A 130,000 year old archeological site in the United States has, for all intents and purposes, been confirmed for 5 year…
A 130,000 year old archeological site in the United States has, for all intents and purposes, been confirmed for 5 years now. https://t.co/zw91HMxLf3
@jessinicoleb The accepted “Science” is constantly updated. They found human activity in California from 130,000 years ago from: https://t.co/yyC5XkVqTX Destroying the scientific consensus the “The first modern humans began moving outside of Africa start
RT @DougAlder: @PaulStewartII Not to mention the indigenous who have been here for at least 30K years (recent discoveries) or if one archae…
RT @thecartulary: @HettrickBernie @ArtifactsHub https://t.co/5JbxPAT8oN No human remains but proof of human activity
@HettrickBernie @ArtifactsHub https://t.co/5JbxPAT8oN No human remains but proof of human activity
RT @Aabhas24: 22/n Not very sure but there is a possibility that the first wave of expansion had reached China & North America around 125 K…
@Syl__Star @JoeBenoi @BSvendrowski @Marknovakusa @nytimes "indicating that humans with manual dexterity and the experiential knowledge to use hammerstones and anvils processed mastodon limb bones for marrow extraction and/or raw material for tool productio
@Kerberos111 Tak to maj blbý, páč jestli je pravda, že z Kalifornie jsou známé pobytové stopy člověka 130 ky staré... https://t.co/7K3WJl9yZa
@FlintDibble @Discovery @stelpavlou @jessphoenix2018 There is credible scientific research that demonstrates human habitation of N. America, i.e. Holen, S., Deméré, T., Fisher, D. et al. A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA. N
RT @Aabhas24: 22/n Not very sure but there is a possibility that the first wave of expansion had reached China & North America around 125 K…
RT @Aabhas24: 22/n Not very sure but there is a possibility that the first wave of expansion had reached China & North America around 125 K…
RT @Aabhas24: 22/n Not very sure but there is a possibility that the first wave of expansion had reached China & North America around 125 K…
RT @Aabhas24: 22/n Not very sure but there is a possibility that the first wave of expansion had reached China & North America around 125 K…
RT @Aabhas24: 22/n Not very sure but there is a possibility that the first wave of expansion had reached China & North America around 125 K…
RT @Aabhas24: 22/n Not very sure but there is a possibility that the first wave of expansion had reached China & North America around 125 K…
RT @Aabhas24: 22/n Not very sure but there is a possibility that the first wave of expansion had reached China & North America around 125 K…
RT @Aabhas24: 22/n Not very sure but there is a possibility that the first wave of expansion had reached China & North America around 125 K…
RT @Aabhas24: 22/n Not very sure but there is a possibility that the first wave of expansion had reached China & North America around 125 K…
22/n Not very sure but there is a possibility that the first wave of expansion had reached China & North America around 125 KYA (read source of 21/n), but would have dispersed without leaving any trace in the genome of contemporary humans. https://t.co
@Peter_Nimitz Don't know if this discovery will ever be proven true or not, but indigenous Americas are using it to support their "Out of America" hypothesis. https://t.co/wqPZFLswyN
@HiddenRoots6 @DiloNaicker @Rainmaker1973 This study claims human presence in NA much earlier than 12-13ky. https://t.co/kKuxbNTyTC
@monicaMedHist (1) archaeological evidence is found in a clearly defined and undisturbed geologic context; (2) age is determined by reliable radiometric dating; (3) multiple lines of evidence from interdisciplinary studies provide consistent results; unide
@EricOrcadian @Desert_Dog_Ex @outrochi @RealWriteWinger @trytostopme14 Out of Africa has been a discredited theory since the 90s. Proposed timelines are impossible in even the most generous of migration assumptions- why would I set that aside? Bottlenecks
Malum, daha önce Amerika'da 130 bin yıllık insan yapımı aletler bulunduğu açıklanmıştı. Bu da aslında ilk geçenlerin <i>Homo sapiens</i> olmayabileceğini gösteriyordu. Ancak daha sonra bu aletlerin insan yapımı olmayabileceği anlaşılmıştı. htt
RT @johnhawks: My early read on this is that it is important work and I want to see more. However, I have a trust deficit for @nature on th…
RT @johnhawks: My early read on this is that it is important work and I want to see more. However, I have a trust deficit for @nature on th…
Well this looks interesting😆☺️😋😝: https://t.co/ISYtwcuDx4 NB - I DO so hope it turns out to be believable in the end! But my hopes aren't up :-)
RT @johnhawks: My early read on this is that it is important work and I want to see more. However, I have a trust deficit for @nature on th…
My early read on this is that it is important work and I want to see more. However, I have a trust deficit for @nature on this topic, after 2017 when the journal hyped the Cerutti Mastodon site. Work on Chiquihuite funded by the same group. https://t.co/Vk
@Kaitlinjesss @lilrednacho Look up the Cerutti mastodon site. It proves Indigenous peoples' presence here since 120,000-140,000 years ago. The evidence to disprove the bering strait land bridge theory is there but often ignored. https://t.co/uKFu0zmSDi
@AndreCosto @archaeoscape Yes, an even better and more embarrassing example. Nature screwed up royally. If these editorial decisions were based on science, the editors would learn from their mistakes. They’re not based on science or good peer-review practi
Memorable el caso de Cerutti Mastodon "archaeological site", una supuesta ocupación americana hace 130.000 años publicada en Nature... https://t.co/C8ap03CsMp
@Papouesse Tu peux leur donner tes biens et ta maison, si tu te sens coupable à ce point. 😂 Tu remontes jusqu'à quand, parce que,eux aussi ont occupé un territoire qui ne leur appartenaient pas. https://t.co/JARof53yq6
@LouLafontaine On peut remonter à beaucoup plus loin que ça. https://t.co/bW3SAl4Frm
RT @Jean__Emard: @ecolumiere On remonte jusqu'où ? https://t.co/bW3SAl4Frm
@ecolumiere On remonte jusqu'où ? https://t.co/bW3SAl4Frm